velocitatem/PHANTOM
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/velocitatem/PHANTOM.git synced 2026-05-31 08:33:36 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

adding balance figure

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Rosel
2026-01-12 10:28:06 +01:00
parent a53ecdedca
commit 4b392fc0a5
2 changed files with 46 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
paper/src/chapters/03-methodology.tex
View File

@@ -225,6 +225,14 @@ In our simulation, the "Follower" is implemented as a set of Actors. Each Actor
As part of our reward engineering we think about the UX factor ($UX \in [0,1]$) whic his our proxy for user experience degradation, this is computed as a mixture of contribution from the separability model metric of $\frac{1}{\text{Specificity}}$. As part of our reward engineering we think about the UX factor ($UX \in [0,1]$) whic his our proxy for user experience degradation, this is computed as a mixture of contribution from the separability model metric of $\frac{1}{\text{Specificity}}$.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\centering
\resizebox{0.5\columnwidth}{!}{%
\input{chapters/balance_figure.tex}
}
\caption{Introducing the UX index allows us to better distinguish the kind of impact different methods have and allows us to compare them on this Pareto-like scale.}
\end{figure}
We also need to think about a policy like taxation to the agents Strategy-Proof Mechanism Design, specifically the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) payment rule. We link and prove that this would create an incentive for the dominant strategy to become truth-telling. We also need to think about a policy like taxation to the agents Strategy-Proof Mechanism Design, specifically the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) payment rule. We link and prove that this would create an incentive for the dominant strategy to become truth-telling.
\section{Heuristics as part of neuro-inspired steering systems} \section{Heuristics as part of neuro-inspired steering systems}

38
paper/src/chapters/balance_figure.tex Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
\begin{tikzpicture}[
% Styles for consistency
axis/.style={->, >=Stealth, line width=1.2pt, color=black!85},
curve/.style={color=black, line width=2.5pt},
point/.style={circle, fill=black, inner sep=0pt, minimum size=6pt},
label_text/.style={font=\sffamily\large, align=center, color=black},
annotation_line/.style={thick, -, color=black!60}
]
% Define Radius
\def\R{5}
% Draw Axes
% Extended slightly beyond radius (\R + 1)
\draw[axis] (0,0) -- (\R+1.5,0) node[midway, below=10pt, font=\bfseries\sffamily\large] {UX Index};
\draw[axis] (0,0) -- (0,\R+1.5) node[midway, left=15pt, rotate=90, font=\bfseries\sffamily\large] {Performance};
% Draw Perfect 1/4 Circle
% Syntax: arc (start_angle : end_angle : radius)
\draw[curve] (0,\R) arc (90:0:\R);
% 1. Paranoid (High Performance side) -> Angle 67.5 degrees
\node[point] (p1) at (75:\R) {};
\node[label_text, above right=0.1cm and 0.1cm of p1] (l1) {Paranoid};
\draw[annotation_line] (l1) -- (p1);
% 2. Perfect Detection (Exact Middle) -> Angle 45 degrees
\node[point] (p2) at (45:\R) {};
\node[label_text, above right=0.2cm and 0.2cm of p2] (l2) {Perfect Detection};
\draw[annotation_line] (l2) -- (p2);
% 3. No Detection (High UX side) -> Angle 22.5 degrees
\node[point] (p3) at (15:\R) {};
\node[label_text, right=0.5cm of p3] (l3) {No Detection};
\draw[annotation_line] (l3) -- (p3);
\end{tikzpicture}