shock: defining new lab environment and formulation

This commit is contained in:
2026-01-23 10:37:32 +01:00
parent a033e77697
commit 4e2e41d943
41 changed files with 4175 additions and 0 deletions

174
lab/population/execution.py Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
"""
Execution models for computing acceptance/fill probabilities.
This module provides different models for how opportunities convert to executions:
- ElasticityExecutionModel: Price elasticity with competitor cross-effects (retail)
- IntensityExecutionModel: Distance-based fill intensity (market making)
- LogitExecutionModel: Discrete choice model
Each model implements the ExecutionModel protocol.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import Any
import numpy as np
from ..outlet.types import Opportunity, Quote, InstrumentSet, MarketState
from ..outlet.constants import Side
from ..outlet.math_util import sigmoid, safe_log, intensity_decay, EPS
@dataclass
class ElasticityConfig:
"""Configuration for price elasticity execution model.
Attributes:
base_prob: Baseline purchase probability at reference price
price_sensitivity: Own-price elasticity coefficient
cross_elasticity: Competitor price cross-elasticity
scraper_conversion: Multiplier for scraper conversion (typically << 1)
"""
base_prob: float = 0.3
price_sensitivity: float = 2.0
cross_elasticity: float = 0.5
scraper_conversion: float = 0.01
class ElasticityExecutionModel:
"""Price elasticity model for retail dynamic pricing.
P(buy) = base_prob * exp(-sensitivity * log(price/ref)) * cross_effect * scraper_mult
Higher prices reduce purchase probability exponentially.
Competitor undercutting shifts demand away from the platform.
Scrapers convert at a much lower rate (reconnaissance, not purchase).
"""
def __init__(self, cfg: ElasticityConfig | None = None):
self.cfg = cfg or ElasticityConfig()
def prob(self, opp: Opportunity, quote: Quote, instruments: InstrumentSet,
market: MarketState | None, rng: np.random.Generator) -> float:
idx = int(opp.instrument_id)
price = quote.prices[idx]
ref = instruments.refs[idx]
# base probability adjusted by price ratio
log_ratio = safe_log(price / ref)
prob = self.cfg.base_prob * np.exp(-self.cfg.price_sensitivity * log_ratio)
# cross-elasticity: competitor undercutting increases their share
if market and market.competitor_quotes is not None:
comp_price = market.competitor_quotes[idx]
if comp_price < price:
prob *= np.exp(-self.cfg.cross_elasticity * (price - comp_price) / ref)
# scrapers convert at much lower rate
if opp.context.get('is_scraper', False):
prob *= self.cfg.scraper_conversion
return float(np.clip(prob, 0, 1))
def uncensor(self, fills: np.ndarray, instruments: InstrumentSet,
context: dict[str, Any] | None = None) -> np.ndarray:
# simple imputation: assume fills = prob * exposures, invert
exposures = context.get('exposures', fills) if context else fills
avg_prob = self.cfg.base_prob
return fills / (avg_prob + EPS)
@dataclass
class IntensityConfig:
"""Configuration for intensity-based execution model.
Attributes:
base_intensity: Baseline fill intensity
kappa: Decay rate with distance from mid-price
vol_scale: Volatility multiplier for fill intensity
"""
base_intensity: float = 1.0
kappa: float = 1.5
vol_scale: float = 0.5
class IntensityExecutionModel:
"""Avellaneda-Stoikov style fill intensity for market making.
Fill probability decays exponentially with distance from mid-price:
P(fill) = base * exp(-kappa * |quote - mid|) * (1 + vol_scale * sigma)
Tighter spreads (closer to mid) have higher fill probability.
Higher volatility increases fill probability (more aggressive traders).
"""
def __init__(self, cfg: IntensityConfig | None = None):
self.cfg = cfg or IntensityConfig()
def prob(self, opp: Opportunity, quote: Quote, instruments: InstrumentSet,
market: MarketState | None, rng: np.random.Generator) -> float:
idx = int(opp.instrument_id)
# get mid price from market or use quote price
if market and market.mid_prices is not None:
mid = market.mid_prices[idx]
else:
mid = quote.prices[idx]
# compute distance from mid
if opp.side == Side.BUY:
exec_price = quote.asks[idx] if quote.asks is not None else quote.prices[idx]
distance = exec_price - mid
else:
exec_price = quote.bids[idx] if quote.bids is not None else quote.prices[idx]
distance = mid - exec_price
# intensity decays with distance
intensity = self.cfg.base_intensity * intensity_decay(abs(distance), self.cfg.kappa)
# volatility increases fill probability
if market and market.volatility is not None:
vol = market.volatility[idx]
intensity *= (1 + self.cfg.vol_scale * vol)
return float(np.clip(intensity, 0, 1))
def uncensor(self, fills: np.ndarray, instruments: InstrumentSet,
context: dict[str, Any] | None = None) -> np.ndarray:
return fills # market making doesn't have same censorship concept
@dataclass
class LogitConfig:
"""Configuration for logit discrete choice model.
Attributes:
beta_0: Intercept (base utility)
beta_price: Price coefficient (typically negative)
beta_quality: Quality attribute coefficient
"""
beta_0: float = 0.5
beta_price: float = -1.5
beta_quality: float = 0.3
class LogitExecutionModel:
"""Discrete choice logit model for purchase probability.
Utility: U = beta_0 + beta_price * (price/ref) + beta_quality * quality
P(buy) = sigmoid(U)
Provides a theoretically grounded demand model from economics literature.
"""
def __init__(self, cfg: LogitConfig | None = None):
self.cfg = cfg or LogitConfig()
def prob(self, opp: Opportunity, quote: Quote, instruments: InstrumentSet,
market: MarketState | None, rng: np.random.Generator) -> float:
idx = int(opp.instrument_id)
price = quote.prices[idx]
ref = instruments.refs[idx]
quality = instruments.instruments[idx].attrs.get('quality', 0.5)
# utility
u = self.cfg.beta_0 + self.cfg.beta_price * (price / ref) + self.cfg.beta_quality * quality
# choice probability via sigmoid
return float(sigmoid(u))
def uncensor(self, fills: np.ndarray, instruments: InstrumentSet,
context: dict[str, Any] | None = None) -> np.ndarray:
return fills / (self.cfg.beta_0 + EPS)