velocitatem/PHANTOM
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/velocitatem/PHANTOM.git synced 2026-05-31 08:33:36 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

better alignment of arrows in diagram

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Rosel
2026-04-09 09:20:55 +02:00
parent 97902f39a3
commit 7e3bcf2520
1 changed files with 25 additions and 24 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

49
paper/src/chapters/hero_architecture_figure.tex
View File

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
bA/.style={rectangle, rounded corners=3pt, draw=heroAmberBorder, fill=heroAmber,
line width=0.9pt, align=center, minimum height=0.85cm},
bY/.style={rectangle, rounded corners=3pt, draw=heroGrayBorder, fill=heroGray,
line width=0.9pt, align=center, minimum height=0.82cm},
line width=0.9pt, align=center, minimum height=0.85cm},
pill/.style={ellipse, draw=black!50, fill=black!4, line width=0.75pt,
align=center, minimum width=1.6cm, minimum height=0.68cm},
arr/.style={->, draw=black!80, line width=0.88pt},
@@ -79,36 +79,37 @@
-- (provider.north);
%% ============================================================
%% Panel B x: 11.6–20.4 y: 2.2–10.0
%% Panel B x: 11.6–20.0 y: 2.2–10.0
%% ============================================================
\draw[panel] (11.6,2.2) rectangle (19.8,10.0);
\draw[panel] (11.6,2.2) rectangle (20.0,10.0);
\node[anchor=west, font=\small\bfseries] at (11.85,9.72) {(b) Distinguishability layer};
\node[bG, minimum width=2.4cm] (session) at (14.0, 8.9) {Session prefix\\$\tau'$};
\node[bB, minimum width=2.4cm] (empKern) at (13.65,7.45) {Empirical kernel\\$\hat T'$};
\node[bY, minimum width=2.4cm] (weakLab) at (17.55,8.9) {Weak labels\\$\mathcal{D}_H,\mathcal{D}_A$};
\node[bY, minimum width=2.2cm] (protoH) at (12.8, 5.9) {Prototype\\$\bar T_H$};
\node[bA, minimum width=2.4cm] (kldist) at (15.55,5.9) {KL distances\\$\Delta_H,\Delta_A$};
\node[bY, minimum width=2.2cm] (protoA) at (18.3, 5.9) {Prototype\\$\bar T_A$};
\node[bB, minimum width=2.9cm] (calHead) at (13.55,4.25) {Contrastive\\calibration head};
\node[bG, minimum width=2.55cm] (score) at (17.75,4.25) {Session score\\$f(\tau'),\hat\alpha(\tau')$};
% x positions shifted +0.3 from the original layout (between left-heavy and +0.55 which hugged the right edge)
\node[bG, minimum width=2.4cm] (session) at (14.3, 8.9) {Session prefix\\$\tau'$};
\node[bB, minimum width=2.4cm] (empKern) at (13.95,7.45) {Empirical kernel\\$\hat T'$};
\node[bY, minimum width=2.4cm] (weakLab) at (17.85,8.9) {Weak labels\\$\mathcal{D}_H,\mathcal{D}_A$};
\node[bY, minimum width=2.2cm] (protoH) at (13.1, 5.9) {Prototype\\$\bar T_H$};
\node[bA, minimum width=2.4cm] (kldist) at (15.85,5.9) {KL distances\\$\Delta_H,\Delta_A$};
\node[bY, minimum width=2.2cm] (protoA) at (18.6, 5.9) {Prototype\\$\bar T_A$};
\node[bB, minimum width=2.9cm] (calHead) at (13.85,4.25) {Contrastive\\calibration head};
\node[bG, minimum width=2.55cm] (score) at (18.05,4.25) {Session score\\$f(\tau'),\hat\alpha(\tau')$};
\node[lbl] at (15.55, 3.15) {$\hat\alpha(\tau')=\sigma\!\left(\beta(\Delta_H-\Delta_A)\right)$};
\node[lbl] at (15.85, 3.15) {$\hat\alpha(\tau')=\sigma\!\left(\beta(\Delta_H-\Delta_A)\right)$};
\draw[arr, rounded corners=4pt] (session.south) -- (empKern.north);
\draw[arr, rounded corners=4pt] (empKern.south) -- (13.65, 6.8) -| (protoH.north);
\draw[arr, rounded corners=4pt] (weakLab.south) -- (17.55, 6.8) -| (protoA.north);
\draw[arr, rounded corners=4pt] (empKern.south) -- (13.95, 6.8) -| (protoH.north);
\draw[arr, rounded corners=4pt] (weakLab.south) -- (17.85, 6.8) -| (protoA.north);
% weak labels -> protoH: go south then hard-left below weakLab
\draw[arr, rounded corners=4pt] (weakLab.south) -- (17.55,6.8) -| (protoH.north east);
\draw[arr, rounded corners=4pt] (weakLab.south) -- (17.85,6.8) -| (protoH.north east);
\draw[arr] (protoH.east) -- (kldist.west);
\draw[arr] (protoA.west) -- (kldist.east);
\draw[arr] (kldist.south) -- (calHead.north east);
\draw[arr] (calHead.east) -- (score.west);
%% ============================================================
%% Panel C x: 20.8–31.0 y: 2.2–10.0
%% Panel C x: 20.4–31.0 y: 2.2–10.0
%% ============================================================
\draw[panel] (20.8,2.2) rectangle (31.0,10.0);
\draw[panel] (20.4,2.2) rectangle (31.0,10.0);
\node[anchor=west, font=\small\bfseries] at (21.05,9.72) {(c) Distributionally robust control};
\node[bB, minimum width=3.1cm] (state) at (23.15, 8.9)
@@ -129,13 +130,13 @@
\draw[arr, rounded corners=4pt] (ambSet.south) -- (23.15, 6.6) -| ([xshift=-2cm]contScen.north);
\draw[arr, rounded corners=4pt] (innerMin.south) -- (28.55, 6.6) -| ([xshift=2cm]contScen.north);
\draw[arr] (contScen.south) -- (reward.north);
\draw[arr, rounded corners=6pt] (reward.south) -- (25.9, 3.7) -| (policy.north);
% join reward to policy along policy.north y so the last segment never approaches north from below (avoids upward arrowhead on top edge)
\draw[arr, rounded corners=4pt] (reward.south) -- (reward.south |- policy.north) -- (policy.north);
\draw[arr] (policy.east) -- (publish.west);
% market response: up the right edge of panel C, entirely inside, rounded
% market response: up the right edge, then left into state summary from the east
\draw[arrG, rounded corners=6pt] (publish.east) -- (30.6, 3.05)
-- (30.6, 9.8)
-- node[midway, lbl] {market response} (state.north |- 0, 9.8)
-- (state.north);
-- (30.6, 8.9)
-- node[midway, above, lbl] {market response} (state.east);
%% ============================================================
%% Cross-panel connectors – gutter at y = 1.0..2.2
@@ -152,8 +153,8 @@
% 2. Score -> State (depth y=1.45)
\draw[crossG, rounded corners=6pt]
(score.south) -- (score.south |- 0, 1.45)
-- node[pos=0.5, lbl] {contamination signal} (20.6, 1.45)
-- (20.6, 8.9)
-- node[pos=0.5, lbl] {contamination signal} (20.2, 1.45)
-- (20.2, 8.9)
-- (state.west);
% 3. Publish -> Provider (depth y=1.05, deepest)