velocitatem/PHANTOM
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/velocitatem/PHANTOM.git synced 2026-07-16 01:53:37 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: improved discussion

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Rosel
2026-04-09 18:19:55 +02:00
parent 0ff0c0432c
commit 895a004807
6 changed files with 48 additions and 23 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
paper/src/chapters/03-methodology.tex
View File

@@ -187,7 +187,17 @@ The interface is organized as a product catalog where each product belongs to a
Since users act with motivations, we define a pool of tasks (jobs to be done) and assign tasks randomly to participants.
We discuss limitations and choices made in this experimental design in Section~\ref{sec:limitations_risks}.
The task pool is stored as a structured table with fields \texttt{id}, \texttt{created\_at}, \texttt{task\_name}, \texttt{task\_description}, and \texttt{task\_def\_of\_done}. We formulate the tasks as compact jobs-to-be-done rather than as rigid instructions, because the target is to elicit realistic browsing and comparison behavior which can capture nuance of different people. In hotel mode the assigned tasks include \textit{Cheapest Room}, \textit{Cheapest Room w/ View}, \textit{MultiStep Cheapest Room}, \textit{The Digital Nomad (Executive)}, and \textit{The 3-Way Tradeoff (Desk + Quiet + Flexible)}. These prompts deliberately require critical thought in search, inspection of room details, comparison of amenities or images, return visits to the listing page, and a final booking decision which create a degree of cognitive load. In airline mode we use \textit{Last-Minute One-Way Flight} or \textit{Family/Work Emergency Travel}, where the actor must urgently travel to LAX from either SEA or JFK within the next 1 to 3 days, inspect at least a small set of candidate itineraries, and then book a reasonable earliest departure.
The task pool is stored as a structured table with fields \texttt{id}, \texttt{created\_at}, \texttt{task\_name}, \texttt{task\_description}, and \texttt{task\_def\_of\_done}. We formulate the tasks as compact jobs-to-be-done rather than as rigid instructions, because the target is to elicit realistic browsing and comparison behavior which can capture nuance of different people. In hotel mode the assigned tasks include \textit{Cheapest Room}, \textit{Cheapest Room w/ View}, \textit{MultiStep Cheapest Room}, \textit{The Digital Nomad (Executive)}, and \textit{The 3-Way Tradeoff (Desk + Quiet + Flexible)}. These prompts deliberately require critical thought in search, inspection of room details, comparison of amenities or images, return visits to the listing page, and a final booking decision which create a degree of cognitive load. In airline mode we use \textit{Last-Minute One-Way Flight} or \textit{Family/Work Emergency Travel}, where the actor must urgently travel to LAX from either SEA or JFK within the next 1 to 3 days, inspect at least a small set of candidate itineraries, and then book a reasonable earliest departure. Figure~\ref{fig:exp_design_tree} summarizes the assignment tree.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\centering
\resizebox{0.88\columnwidth}{!}{%
\input{chapters/figures/experiment_design_tree.tex}
}
\caption{Experimental design decision tree for participant assignment.}
\label{fig:exp_design_tree}
\end{figure}
A representative task is to find the cheapest feasible catalog item under explicit constraints while removing strict financial limits so we avoid trivial optimization behavior. Participants are also randomly assigned to one experimental platform mode (hotel or airline). Once assigned, they are dropped into the experiment with an actor ID. Under each experiment ID, we can observe multiple sessions across time and gather long interaction traces for the same actor. This de-risks our lower sample size of individuals by allowing broad interaction data to come from each one.
The human data collection involved 13 participants, all of whom provided explicit informed consent prior to their session. Participants had an average age of 21 years and were recruited from a university population. Alongside the 13 human sessions we ran 16 agent sessions of equivalent task scope, yielding 29 labeled trajectories in total (45\% human, 55\% agent). Each participant was assigned a single platform mode and a single task drawn from the pool, and completed the session independently without guidance on navigation or pricing strategy.