From a53ecdedca69d050620546dc0b169a82feb6c06f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Rosel <daniel@alves.world>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2026 19:41:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] trying different title

---
 paper/src/auto/main.el               |  8 +++-----
 paper/src/chapters/05-discussion.tex | 10 ++++++++++
 paper/src/main.tex                   |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/paper/src/auto/main.el b/paper/src/auto/main.el
index 517411a..6738458 100644
--- a/paper/src/auto/main.el
+++ b/paper/src/auto/main.el
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
    (setq TeX-command-extra-options
          "-file-line-error -interaction=nonstopmode")
    (TeX-add-to-alist 'LaTeX-provided-class-options
-                     '(("report" "12pt") ("article" "12pt") ("acmart" "sigconf" "nonacm" "natbib=false" "manuscript")))
+                     '(("report" "12pt") ("acmart" "sigconf" "nonacm" "natbib=false" "manuscript") ("article" "12pt" "letterpaper")))
    (TeX-run-style-hooks
     "latex2e"
     "preamble"
@@ -17,9 +17,7 @@
     "chapters/05-discussion"
     "chapters/06-conclusion"
     "../build/concatenated_code"
-    "acmart"
-    "acmart10")
-   (TeX-add-symbols
-    '("footnotetextcopyrightpermission" 1)))
+    "article"
+    "art12"))
  :latex)
 
diff --git a/paper/src/chapters/05-discussion.tex b/paper/src/chapters/05-discussion.tex
index a2052a1..6cd6362 100644
--- a/paper/src/chapters/05-discussion.tex
+++ b/paper/src/chapters/05-discussion.tex
@@ -1,5 +1,15 @@
 \section{Discussion}
 
+\subsection{Transition to Agentic Market Microstructure}
+
+Our analysis of the interaction dynamics between the platform and non-human actors suggests that the current static pricing models are insufficient for an agent-mediated economy. If we assume a transition toward a direct revelation mechanism, where actors must reveal their true valuation of a good through bidding dynamics, we inevitably introduce significant stochasticity into the pricing system. Unlike traditional e-commerce where prices are relatively sticky, such a mechanism implies a high volatility characteristic of financial equity markets (without the fungability however).
+
+However, ecommerce commodities differ fundamentally from financial securities: they possess a hard floor defined by unit economics and reservation prices. The market might react enthusiastically to an iPhone priced at \$1, such a transaction is not permissible. The platform must establish an initial valuation anchor ($P_{0}$) defined by the marginal cost plus a target margin, around which the market price is permitted to fluctuate. We propose the introduction of GenAI Agents as Institutional Market Makers.
+
+This is also under the assumption of expected transactional capabilities being given to AI Agents.
+
+
+
 \subsection{Risk Assessment and Limitations}
 
 Acknowledge risks and constraints and data sizes.
diff --git a/paper/src/main.tex b/paper/src/main.tex
index 6506fcf..fd9298e 100644
--- a/paper/src/main.tex
+++ b/paper/src/main.tex
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 
 \begin{document}
 
-\title{Pricing Heuristics Against Non-human Transaction Orchestration Mechanisms}
+\title{Adversarially Distributionally Robust Optimization and Reinforcement Learning for Informed Dynamic Pricing under Strategic Demand Contamination}
 
 \author{
   Daniel Rösel\thanks{Primary author and student researcher. Email: daniel@alves.world} \\