scary

paper/src/chapters/06-conclusion.tex

@@ -21,4 +21,6 @@ Now we very explicitly mention what we contribute in this paper:
 
 \subsection{Future Works and Next Steps}
 
-During the eights months of research dedicated to this work, a plethora of opportunities and industry gaps was identified, sadly a majority of which could not be addressed directly.
+In our effort to tackle this work we initiated a set of constraints which we hope to relax in future iterations and hope that some of these will be addressed in industry. First of these constraints is the weighting of different actions within the demand estimation, which we would ideally find through learned methodology. Next, assumption of perfect alternating turns between the platform and the market calls for a fixed length non-strictly alternating state definition with a history of actions to possibly allow for the development of multi agentic or multi platform simulation. In our simulation we also make assumptions of non-perishable supply of items, which creates the biggest sim-to-real gap in our system. We also would like to further remove intra-session stationary nature of the contamination parameter to further create high-fidelity non-stationarity within a single evaluation window.
+
+For deployment of this it is advised to collect a higher sample size of human baselines and to complement this with the simulated agentic sessions and to mind the matrix scaling for very large catalog sizes.