From f7ec2e0f9d50c0e79a77df331cddf5b62314b84b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Rosel <daniel@alves.world>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 14:18:33 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] extra

---
 paper/src/main.tex | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/paper/src/main.tex b/paper/src/main.tex
index 5aaa7c1..e248a8b 100644
--- a/paper/src/main.tex
+++ b/paper/src/main.tex
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 
 \begin{document}
 
-\title{Pricing Heuristics Against Non-human Transaction Orchestration Mechanisms}
+\title{First Proposal: Pricing Heuristics Against Non-human Transaction Orchestration Mechanisms}
 
 \author{Daniel Rösel}
 \email{daniel@alves.world}
@@ -82,11 +82,12 @@ The first step is measuring how well we can separate human from agent session da
 What really matters for the larger picture is the economic impact of accurate demand estimation. We measure this through revenue leakage and revenue recovery. For benchmarking, we need to compare scenarios under default pricing policies versus adjusted ones - this gives us lower and upper bounds for our performance.
 Since we're also concerned with human-centric outcomes, we need to collect user friction ratings that compare more radical solutions (like CAPTCHAs) against minimal or no defenses.
 
+
 \printbibliography
 
 % \clearpage
 % \onecolumn
 % \appendix
-% \input{../build/concatenated_code}
+
 
 \end{document}