This commit is contained in:
2025-11-14 14:18:33 +01:00
parent 2dc3dad0a5
commit f7ec2e0f9d

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
\begin{document} \begin{document}
\title{Pricing Heuristics Against Non-human Transaction Orchestration Mechanisms} \title{First Proposal: Pricing Heuristics Against Non-human Transaction Orchestration Mechanisms}
\author{Daniel Rösel} \author{Daniel Rösel}
\email{daniel@alves.world} \email{daniel@alves.world}
@@ -82,11 +82,12 @@ The first step is measuring how well we can separate human from agent session da
What really matters for the larger picture is the economic impact of accurate demand estimation. We measure this through revenue leakage and revenue recovery. For benchmarking, we need to compare scenarios under default pricing policies versus adjusted ones - this gives us lower and upper bounds for our performance. What really matters for the larger picture is the economic impact of accurate demand estimation. We measure this through revenue leakage and revenue recovery. For benchmarking, we need to compare scenarios under default pricing policies versus adjusted ones - this gives us lower and upper bounds for our performance.
Since we're also concerned with human-centric outcomes, we need to collect user friction ratings that compare more radical solutions (like CAPTCHAs) against minimal or no defenses. Since we're also concerned with human-centric outcomes, we need to collect user friction ratings that compare more radical solutions (like CAPTCHAs) against minimal or no defenses.
\printbibliography \printbibliography
% \clearpage % \clearpage
% \onecolumn % \onecolumn
% \appendix % \appendix
% \input{../build/concatenated_code}
\end{document} \end{document}